DenmarkErhvervsstyrelsen
Boards need Erhvervsstyrelsen permission for foundation bylaw changes
Boards file the amendment on virk.dk within 2 weeks of the decision and need Erhvervsstyrelsen permission; purpose or surplus-use changes face a strict unworkability test with no separate Civilstyrelsen consent.
By Taxxa AI OyPublished 22 October 2026
Industry: Trusts, funds and similar financial entities
A board of an erhvervsdrivende fond cannot amend the foundation's vedtægt on its own.Erhvervsstyrelsen The board must obtain permission from Erhvervsstyrelsen as fondsmyndighed on the board's proposal before the change takes effect
Erhvervsstyrelsen; without permission the amendment is invalid and has no legal effect
Erhvervsstyrelsen. The only exception is an amendment that is a necessary consequence of a capital increase under erhvervsfondslovens § 35, stk. 2.
Erhvervsstyrelsen There is no separate Civilstyrelsen consent step
Retsinformation: the board files with Erhvervsstyrelsen, which examines the proposal and, when it grants permission, completes the registration at the same time.
The board decides first and notifies the change in Erhvervsstyrelsens selvbetjeningsløsning on virk.dk within 2 weeks of the decisionErhvervsstyrelsen, correcting registered information such as formål, tegningsregel or hjemsted where affected. The filing encloses proof of lawful adoption, a new dated vedtægt in full wording, a reasoned account and a three-column overview of current wording, proposed wording and comments per provision, omissible only for very few changes. If the changes cannot be permitted as filed, Erhvervsstyrelsen typically opens a dialogue and may request supplementary information. For extensive changes the board may seek a preliminary indication before deciding, though that lengthens handling time.
Every amendment must be well founded, documented and supported by a board account showing it objectively serves the foundation's interest, sometimes with a revisor or expert statement. A vedtægt expresses the founder's wishes; a living founder's view carries some weight without deciding the outcome, while regard for third parties as such carries no weight. Purely linguistic modernisation is as a starting point not enough. Provisions on formål or anvendelse af overskud may be permitted only where the provision cannot be complied with, or only with difficulty, or has become inexpedientErhvervsstyrelsen; other provisions where the change is necessary or expedient and in the foundation's interest. Provisions given special weight at formation, such as a founder-named name or an unamendability clause, are harder to change, though such a clause alone does not bar amendment. Amendment is decided by simple majority unless the vedtægt requires a qualified majority.
A purpose reflects the founder's will rather than actual activities, and interpretation of the vedtægt precedes amendment: only where no solution within the wording exists does an amendment arise, typically from external events beyond the board's control. Larger purpose changes demand stronger proof, must stay closely connected to the original provision and go no further than changed conditions require. Tax considerations may support inexpediency, but a lost deduction alone does not justify changing a purpose, and an almennyttigt or almenvelgørende distribution purpose can never be replaced wholly or partly by a family purpose or similar. No amendment may curtail individuals' legitimate expectations of benefits.
Administrative rights the vedtægt grants a third party, such as appointing board members, cannot be changed without that person's consent absent special circumstances such as disloyal stewardship, blocking an operationally suitable change, harassment or unreachability. Curtailing an appointment right starts from a concrete written consent; for a dissolved entitled organisation proof of dissolution is enclosed instead, and for an entitled person in liquidation consent comes from the liquidator.
Apart from board proposals, Erhvervsstyrelsen may after negotiation with the board order a provision changed where it is unenforceable or clearly inexpedient, and may order a change where a provision contravenes legislation or the formation document; both are extraordinary steps for isolated cases.
Legal basis is lov om erhvervsdrivende fonde, particularly §§ 27, 35, 53, 89 and 90, with notification through Erhvervsstyrelsens selvbetjeningsløsning on virk.dk.
Decide the bylaw amendment at a board meeting, then file it on virk.dk within 2 weeks with the adoption proof, full new bylaws, reasoned account and provision-by-provision comparison.
Sources
- Vedtægtsændringer i erhvervsdrivende fonde
- Forslag til Lov om ændring af lov om erhvervsdrivende fonde, årsregnskabsloven og forskellige andre love og om ophævelse af lov om registrerede socialøkonomiske virksomheder (Ophævelse af visse krav m.v. for erhvervsdrivende fonde, nægtelse af godkendelse som ejendomsmægler som følge af strafbare forhold, nedlæggelse af Revisorrådet og offentliggørelse af oplysninger om konkurskarantæner i CVR)